Could An AI Robot Run Your Company?

by   |   December 29, 2016 5:30 am   |   4 Comments

Bernard Marr

Bernard Marr

Robots — or more specifically, artificial intelligence — have become a major part of our modern, connected lives. We ask Siri for recommendations on where to eat, ask Google for directions to the restaurant, ask our car to play music or make a phone call, ask our house to turn on the lights and the heat before we get home.

But would you let an AI robot run your company?

One already does. Deep Knowledge Ventures, a Hong Kong-based life science venture capital company, has already appointed an AI robot to its board of directors. The robot, called Vital (Validating Investment Tool for Advancing Life Sciences) was designed to analyze trends in the data of certain companies in an effort to predict successful investments.

Vital is an equal member of the board and is expected to eventually be given an equal vote in all financial decisions made by the company.

“The variables involved in the long-term success of a biotechnology company are many and complex,” Deep Knowledge Ventures said in a statement. “We were attracted to a software tool that could in large part automate due diligence and use historical datasets to uncover trends that are not immediately obvious to humans surveying top-line data.”

The “robot” is, in this case, an algorithm, tasked with analyzing vast amounts of big data from life sciences and pharmaceutical companies and then making a recommendation on whether or not the companies would be a profitable investment for the firm.

And while it seems strange and science fiction-esque to imagine a robot — of any sort — on the board of a company, many companies already rely on big data tools, machine learning, and deep learning algorithms to make recommendations about the direction the company should go. The only difference, really, is that in those cases, a human is interpreting the data and deciding whether or not the advice is sound.

In the case of Deep Knowledge Ventures, they have eliminated that human interpretation and given the computer an equal vote. Of course, there are five other human members of the board that could easily outvote the computer, minimizing the risk of being the first company to have a robot on its board.

We have already proved that computers can surpass humans at certain tasks, and as machine learning and deep learning improve and develop, their abilities will only increase. If an algorithm can better detect breast cancers than a human radiologist, or more quickly and efficiently find relevant documents for a court case, why couldn’t they also (eventually) make better financial predictions and decisions than a human board member?

Is it a good idea to let a computer decide the fate of your company?  Frankly, it depends on the computer. But assuming that the algorithms are sound and the data clean, AI can produce insights that humans would miss, and can predict outcomes with a great deal of accuracy.

Only time will tell if Vital will successfully fill this role for its company.

How would you feel about an AI robot being appointed to the board of directors of your company? Would it make you feel more or less confident in the future of the company? I’d be interested in your opinions in the comments below.

 

Bernard Marr is a bestselling author, keynote speaker, strategic performance consultant, and analytics, KPI, and big data guru. In addition, he is a member of the Data Informed Board of Advisers. He helps companies to better manage, measure, report, and analyze performance. His leading-edge work with major companies, organizations, and governments across the globe makes him an acclaimed and award-winning keynote speaker, researcher, consultant, and teacher.

 

Subscribe to Data Informed for the latest information and news on big data and analytics for the enterprise, plus get instant access to more than 20 eBooks.

Tags: , , , , ,

4 Comments

  1. Hezrone Mujawo
    Posted December 29, 2016 at 5:34 pm | Permalink

    i would not entirely be confident because this is a machine and at the end of the day malfunctions do occur.Implementing a robot to be a board member would still require a human to give a final say so whatever data that is gathered from the robot requires greater scrutiny before being actually used.

  2. Nairi
    Posted January 1, 2017 at 12:15 pm | Permalink

    I have no problem with computers making decisions for a company as Ray Dalio of Bridgewater & Associate hopes to do – certainly a new way of management.

  3. Wouter
    Posted January 7, 2017 at 11:18 am | Permalink

    The world breaks open faster and faster. It is the time in which computers speak our language and technology is closely linked to our needs and the human and machine/robot, intensively interconnect and will improve together. Yes, also in directors board, of an organization. Provided, of course, the form, structure and management of an organization by the same revolution will also change dramatically.

  4. Dan Dunham
    Posted January 8, 2017 at 11:28 pm | Permalink

    So you trust a team of programers and analysts to write the code that allows a machine to “learn” enough to “run” a company? Who do you ask about the assumptions this team has made about how this.machine ” learns” will this machine be able to convince a skeptical board? Or make an unexpected move in the market that might save the company? These are the questions I have.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>